The Primer · Tools & Stacks
The vibe coding stack: what to pay for and what to skip
Vendor-neutral
Two slots earn the money: the editor and the agent, $40 a month at sticker. Here is the whole vibe coding stack, slot by slot, what each one really costs, what the field runs, and the version that costs nothing.
Andrej Karpathy named it in a February 2025 post: a way of building where you “fully give in to the vibes” and let the model write the code. Ten months later Collins made vibe coding its Word of the Year for 2025. The tools caught the wave, and the pricing pages got complicated.
Here is the whole answer up front. The vibe coding stack is four slots, and only two are worth paying for from day one: an AI editor (Cursor, $20 a month) and a terminal agent (Claude Code, on the $20 Claude Pro plan). That is $40 a month at sticker. Everything else, the app builders, a second assistant, an extra chat subscription, is optional. Every price here comes from the vendor’s own page, cross-checked against our maintained price index.
What the field runs
Before the slot-by-slot, the map. In Stack Overflow’s 2025 survey, 84% of developers use or plan to use AI tools, up from 76% a year earlier, and the tools they name most are the core slots and their cheap cousin: ChatGPT at 81.7%, GitHub Copilot at 67.9%, and Claude Code at 40.8%. The prompt-to-app builders trail in single digits: v0 at 9.1%, Bolt at 6.5%, Lovable at 5.7%. JetBrains’ January 2026 survey of over 10,000 developers puts Cursor and Claude Code tied for second at work behind Copilot, and gives Claude Code the highest loyalty scores in the category, a 91% satisfaction rating and an NPS of 54. None of this tells you what to buy. It tells you the editor-and-agent core is where the working population sits, and the builder slot is a minority tool.
The two slots that earn the money
The editor: Cursor, $20 a month. In-context work: edits, refactors, test scaffolding, the tab-complete that keeps you in flow. The catch is the meter behind the plan. Cursor’s $20 Pro includes about $20 of model usage, and once that is spent, continued use is billed as on-demand usage in arrears at API rates. It is opt-in, not a surprise charge, and completions stay unlimited, but hand-picking frontier models is how a $20 plan becomes a $40 month. Cursor learned this in public. In June 2025 it restructured Pro from a fixed request count to that metered pool, “unlimited” turned out to mean only the cheaper Auto model, users got surprise bills, and Anysphere apologized and issued refunds. Set the spend limit on day one.
The agent: Claude Code, $20 a month on Claude Pro. The terminal agent is the half of vibe coding the editor cannot do: hand it a whole task and let it run. Claude Pro includes Claude Code on one shared usage pool, so a heavy agent afternoon eats the same allowance as your chats. When the agent becomes your main tool, the $100 Max plan, up to $200 for the 20x tier, stops being extravagant. Anthropic added weekly caps in July 2025 aimed at the heavy tail it estimated at under 5% of subscribers, a figure a later class action disputes, so the ceiling is real if you run the agent hard. This is not a fringe tool. Anthropic reports Claude Code past a $2.5 billion run rate as of February 2026.
But does it even make you faster
Here is the part the vendor pages will never show you. When METR ran a randomized trial in early 2025, experienced open-source developers were 19% slower completing real tasks with AI tools, and the tool they mostly used was Cursor Pro. The developers thought they were 20% faster. That gap between felt speed and measured speed is the whole risk of a metered stack: you cannot feel your real velocity any more than you can feel your real spend. The other side is real too. A GitHub-run experiment found 55.8% faster on a fixed coding task, and METR’s own February 2026 update walked the slowdown toward zero on newer tools, though it calls that follow-up data unreliable. The point is not to skip the stack. It is to measure, rather than vibe, whether it pays off, which is the only reason to read a bill at all.
The optional slot: the app builder
Lovable ($25 a month), Bolt ($25), and v0 ($30 per user) sell the same promise: describe the app, get the app. For a non-coder shipping a first product, the slot can be worth it. If you already run the editor and the agent, you can usually skip it, and the meter is why. Lovable prices by request complexity, a styling tweak around 0.50 credits, adding authentication around 1.20, debugging is billed like any other request with no exemption, and a deployed app keeps drawing credits from the same pool while it runs. Bolt counts tokens, $25 for 10 million a month, and burns them faster as a project grows, because it re-syncs your files to the model on every message. None of that is a scandal; it is metered pricing doing its job, the same trap the $20 AI app walks into. The mistake is reading the subscription as the cost when the meter is the cost.
What to skip, and why
GitHub Copilot ($10). The cheapest seat and, by both surveys, the most-adopted AI coding tool, so if you want one paid tool and live in VS Code it is a defensible sole pick. But it fills the same slot as Cursor. Its billing also changed on June 1, 2026: premium requests became dollar-denominated AI Credits, $15 a month on Pro, while code completions stay unlimited. Paying for Copilot and Cursor is buying one slot twice.
Windsurf. The standalone editor is gone; it is Devin Desktop now. That competes for the agent slot, which is already taken.
A second chat subscription. ChatGPT Plus is $20 and Codex rides along with it. If your agent is Claude Code, that is a same-slot duplicate. One frontier subscription used hard beats two used at half attention.
The $0 stack
A real free stack exists in 2026, and it is better than it used to be. Gemini CLI gives 60 model requests a minute and 1,000 a day at no charge with a personal Google account, a genuine free agent rather than a teaser. Pair it with Copilot Free, 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests a month with agent mode included, or Cursor’s free Hobby tier, and you can vibe code a real thing for nothing. What breaks first is the caps: 50 Copilot chats or a day’s Gemini quota vanish fast in an agent loop, and Claude Code has no free tier at all. The free stack is for finding which slot you would use every day. Then pay for that one first.
The bill
| Slot | Tool | Sticker | A heavy month |
|---|---|---|---|
| Editor | Cursor Pro | $20 | $40 to $50 with frontier models |
| Agent | Claude Code (Claude Pro) | $20 | $100 on Max, if it becomes the main tool |
| App builder | optional | $0 | $25 to $30 if you take the slot |
| Total | $40 | $60 to $150 |
The sticker total is $40. A heavy month runs higher, and our estimate is $60 to $70, which is an estimate on purpose: the metering is documented on every plan, but no vendor publishes what an average build spends. That is the reason to check the bill against the price index once a month and cancel the slot that stopped earning. How the tools fit together day to day is its own piece; this one is the money.
One email, when there's something worth sending
Get the receipts in your inbox.
No fixed schedule, no filler. You get an email when we've tested something, run the numbers, or found a tool worth your time.
Free. Double opt-in, unsubscribe in one click.
Running a different stack? Compare notes in the forum ↗
Sources
| Source | Link |
|---|---|
| Stack Overflow 2025 Developer Survey, AI section. 84% of developers use or plan to use AI tools (up from 76%); out-of-the-box tool use: ChatGPT 81.7%, GitHub Copilot 67.9%, Claude Code 40.8%, v0 9.1%, Bolt 6.5%, Lovable 5.7%; 60% favorable, 46% distrust accuracy vs 33% trust. | survey.stackoverflow.co ↗ |
| JetBrains AI Pulse survey (January 2026, 10,000+ developers). 90% regularly use an AI tool at work; Copilot 29% workplace use, Cursor and Claude Code tied at 18%; Claude Code CSAT 91%, NPS 54. | blog.jetbrains.com ↗ |
| Cursor pricing. Individual (Pro) $20/mo including about $20 of model usage, then on-demand usage billed in arrears at API rates. Verified 2026-07-11. | cursor.com ↗ |
| Cursor, "June 2025 pricing" (the restructure from a fixed request count to a metered usage pool). | cursor.com ↗ |
| TechCrunch (2025-07-07), "Cursor apologizes for unclear pricing changes that upset users." | techcrunch.com ↗ |
| Anthropic / Claude pricing. Claude Pro $20/mo ($17 annual) includes Claude Code; Max from $100/mo. Verified 2026-07-11. | claude.com ↗ |
| Anthropic help center: Max 5x is $100/mo and Max 20x is $200/mo; Claude Code shares one usage pool with the Claude apps, with opt-in usage credits at API rates after limits. | support.claude.com ↗ |
| TechCrunch (2025-07-28), "Anthropic unveils new rate limits to curb Claude Code power users" (weekly caps, self-estimated to hit under 5% of subscribers). | techcrunch.com ↗ |
| Anthropic (2026-02-12), Series G announcement. Claude Code run-rate revenue past $2.5 billion, more than doubled since the start of 2026. | anthropic.com ↗ |
| METR (2025-07-10), randomized trial: experienced open-source developers were 19% slower with early-2025 AI tools (mostly Cursor Pro) while believing they were 20% faster. Preprint, arXiv:2507.09089. | metr.org ↗ |
| METR (2026-02-24) update: the late-2025 follow-up estimated a near-zero effect on newer tools, which METR itself flags as an unreliable signal. | metr.org ↗ |
| Peng et al. (2023), GitHub/Microsoft controlled experiment: developers with GitHub Copilot completed a coding task 55.8% faster. Vendor-affiliated, arXiv:2302.06590. | arxiv.org ↗ |
| GitHub Copilot plans. Pro $10/mo (incl. $15 of AI Credits), Pro+ $39, Max $100; premium requests became dollar-denominated AI Credits on 2026-06-01; completions stay unlimited on paid; Free tier is 2,000 completions and 50 chat requests a month. Verified 2026-07-11. | github.com ↗ |
| Lovable credits and usage. Build requests priced by complexity (a styling tweak ~0.50 credits, authentication ~1.20); no debugging exemption; a deployed app keeps drawing credits; free tier 5/day, 30/mo. | docs.lovable.dev ↗ |
| Bolt.new pricing. Pro $25/mo from 10M tokens; free 300K/day, 1M/mo; token use scales with project size (files re-synced to the model each message). Verified 2026-07-11. | bolt.new ↗ |
| Google (2025-06-25), introducing Gemini CLI: free with a personal Google account at 60 model requests/minute and 1,000/day. | blog.google ↗ |
| Andrej Karpathy (2025-02-02), the post that coined "vibe coding." | x.com ↗ |
| The Bookseller (2025-11-06): "vibe coding" named Collins Dictionary Word of the Year 2025. | thebookseller.com ↗ |